They Weaponised Your Disbelief (The Ultimate Psyop) (Feat. Eros) Silas Speaks

Silas and crew continue to put out some of the most thought-provoking discussions out there. 

Eros presents a very interesting perspective.   I agree that we are meant to find  their "clues" which are layed out for us.  I don't embrace the depopulation angle.  We are the farm animals necessary to keep the farm viable. My position is that a nonhuman machine intelligence has come into this realm and is attempting to model manKIND...how we think, how we feel,  and attempt to access our spirit or soul

Very interesting comment and subsequent reply by Silas...

With all due respect to Mr Interstitial - the reason I came to the conclusion the Butler ear shot and the CK event do not cause fear is because both of those events are nonsense. That doesn’t mean that if I see a man w a large firearm in my day to day life I won’t be scared. Also I’m not sure Mr. Interstitial is aware that the reason I do not fear a virus or a nuclear bomb is because neither of them exist.

@silasspeaks3301

3 days ago

Thank you for your comment! "With all due respect to Mr Interstitial - the reason I came to the conclusion the Butler ear shot and the CK event do not cause fear is because both of those events are nonsense" I suspect you are failing to identify the broader point we are making here: Like with most of the "nothing ever happened" crowd, one becomes entirely fixated on the event itself rather than the physical architecture that is then put in place in the wake of that initiatory event. As can be gleaned from the implicit ideas present in your entire comment, this lack of impetus for threat-detection (fear, as you term it) is extended to that aforementioned physical architecture itself, hence you remain a frictionless, smugly over-confident spectator of the event, rather than the wider implications from the said event. By such a psychological condition, you still remain a member of the theatre, yet you have assumed a seat in the critics section of the audience. Again, this peculiar fixation over the particulars of an event rather than the outcome from that said event, is why we are stating, quite rightly I may add, that these events are ARGs designed to look fake as a means of bringing about cognitive exhaustion and Terminal Discernment (the psychological state wherein an individual's skepticism (Geist/Intellect) becomes so absolute and hyper-active that it completely severs their connection to physical reality (Physis), resulting in permanent physical and social paralysis). Truly, the system also cultivates such hyper-skepticism in the conspiratorially-minded, those of an emergent intellectual class who would otherwise be a threat to this system of total bio-digital control, and thus they are neutered through a kind of "Cyber-Gnostic" ataraxia (a state of unexciting tranquility and emotional detachment) wherein the physical and social spheres are eventually abandoned as it is determined to be counterfeit itself, along with dissolving any potential physical and social resistance itself. This is the terminal Entwirklichung or De-realisation that we spoke of, where the death of reality ensues and one cannot discriminate between the abstractions of the screen and the physical reality of the system, hence it ends in solipsism where the mind isolates itself and induces an inertia as related to action as a means of protecting one's ego from the fear of being duped. "Also I’m not sure Mr. Interstitial is aware that the reason I do not fear a virus or a nuclear bomb is because neither of them exist." As the system designed it to be, the labyrinthine and puzzling conundrum of the web of interconnected yet seemingly disparate psyops that assail us with great ferocity was intentional in both its quantity and quality. They very well know the belittling nature of the informational transaction that is ongoing with the multitude of psyops and events, between the system and its victims, thus they must ensure even the potential dissident population remain distracted by the frame of the Geist, the mediation of abstraction from the screen (a cover between reality and the contrived hyperreality), and this is achieved by instilling into one a feeling of intellectual superiority, of which I refer to your smug use of "Mr.Interstitial", while one remains powerless in a digital pod of safety, where one can state with utter assuredness that something Nuclear Weapons and Viruses do not exist, yet their very religiosity surrounding such assuredness was born from the screen itself. Of course, I speculate and suspect that Nuclear Weapons and Viruses do not exist, though I will not be so presumptuous to emphatically assert that they most certainly do not exist. As should be understood, who could test such a hypothesis in the physical world to claim such a thing? Yourself? Sure, C-19 was a farce, but Virus is merely Latin for "poison", thus the system and its boundless sense of dark humour may have an entirely distinct viewpoint of what constitutes a "Virus". I suspect you believe Germ Theory is trite, too? I suspect this, though I will not emphatically tie myself to the mast or marry myself to the theology, but have you sourced this conviction from that of the physical world (i.e., have you drunk water from suspected cholera-infested hellscapes or have you been around the contagiously afflicted, or, alternatively, have you stayed for a prolonged period of time in the Exclusion Zone of Chernobyl)? I wager you have not, as I have also been exposed to the documentaries and information that came from nowhere and wormed its way into the minds of the dissident classes, like a fast-spreading prion. The evidence is compelling in the case of the Nuclear Weapons hoax, but will I vehemently state that they do not exist? No, I could not in good conscience. Apropos that statement, it is clear that such conviction is born of the same compulsion that we have thus spoke of: The fear of being duped. Hence, you are not afraid of them, but you are afraid of fear itself. Extrapolating this digitally-derived neuroses forth, is it conceivable that this psychological condition, where the fear of being duped has overridden the biological fear of physical death, was carefully cultivated in the minds of the dissident population by a system busily heaping up the enclosing sepulchre, the digital binds of a hydra so monstrous that it will eventually seek to sap mankind of the very fire that ensures life's rambunctious and unpredictable vivacity?

Show less

@silasspeaks3301

3 days ago (edited)

However, as is evident from the psychological ramifications of these automatic convictions of falsehood, threat-detection diminishes markedly and if any biowarfare agent was deployed against us en masse, then in our state of radical skepticism we would be powerless to respond to it. Moreover, such radical skepticism also extends to our ability to form communities in the physical world, with most of these conspiratorial cultures or "communities" being entirely parasocial, hence trackable and "data-mineable". In such a setting, they pose absolutely no threat to the system itself and being inherently prone to infighting, as such radical skepticism promotes a radical atomisation or hyper-individualism through the innate distrust borne by such ideological positions of "nothing ever happened" or "automatic denialism", etc. Indeed, one may feel as though by assuming an automatic denialism of the authenticity of the said event and the broader authenticity of the outcomes, or of the very society itself, is somehow the final, sought-after transcendent escape from the system. Yet, it is clear, it is merely the terminal stage of the process of the castration of one's own ability to pose any physical threat to the system itself. It is a reverse psychological trick where the system ensures the pacification of the High-IQ dissident populace through a containment-chamber of reacting to the stream of ARG abstraction, and the dopaminurgic-high they achieve from "identifying the anomalies". And, yes, this effect occurs even with the non-reaction or non-participatory auto-denialism as it is merely the terminal stage of this process of cognitive or epistemic exhaustion. "That doesn’t mean that if I see a man w a large firearm in my day to day life I won’t be scared." This is a rather damning statement and underlines this peculiar psychological condition that we are speaking of. From this statement alone, we know that your position is entirely born of the same abstractions as the normative masses themselves, though you believe it to be objective truth, ergo the sensation of "knowledge" of this or that's existence or non-existence. Indeed, you concede that you would fear a man with a large firearm in your day-to-day life. Why? Because your biological organism, your Body-Soul unity, cannot deny the immediate, tactile friction of a kinetic threat standing five feet away from you. In that moment, your survival instinct works perfectly. But when the threat scales beyond your immediate line of sight, when it becomes systemic, microscopic, invisible, or geopolitical, your Intellect (Geist) short-circuits. That Heraclitean reality of Polemos (war, strife), a world filled with invisible pathogens, the relentless murder-machine of maniacal powerbrokers, and even radiation is far too terrifying for your Ego to bear. Hence, you deploy the ultimate psychological safety blanket: You declare that [insert bogeyman] "do not exist." In fact, even beyond the bogeyman themselves, which they quite correctly may not exist (emphasis on "may"), but by stating that these things do not exist also nullifies the potential of one looking further into those matters that, for example, the "virus" or "nuclear weapons" cover may be obfuscating or sequestering. In such an enclosed self-feeding loop, you have thence shrunk your reality-tunnel down to what you can physically touch, and you've decided that everything outside of that radius is just a movie script, which it may well be, but the physical ramifications from these events and matters bear effect on the physical reality itself. Am I stating that one should believe wholeheartedly in Germ-Theory or the existence of Nuclear Weapons? No. However, that said, total assuredness in non-existence based on abstractions and shadows born of a screen is but the equivalent of building yet another Platonic Cave inside of the one whose shadows you have come to despise. This is not the hallmarks of the pursuit of truth, nor is it altogether prudent or wise, it is quite clearly another trap; an orthodoxy of negation, the relinquishing of one's own capacity for threat-detection, a fear of fear itself. Ultimately, it has reached a point in these circles that they care not for truth, but for the convoluted psychological defense of their own ego whilst in the growing physical jaws of a voracious beast. A painless concentration camp, a benumbed sensation where a Cyber-Gnostic-derived superiority complex that induces total paralysis from a now-manifest frictionless spectre of the digitally abstract, wherefrom the afflicted are unable to establish any interstitial (cause-and-effect) connections between events themselves (they focus on the phoniness of the event rather than the reality of the physical architecture of the system itself, coupled with the physical ramifications of the said event that reverberate in their own existence). Alas, your comment is, unfortunately, both an admission and a vindication of everything we drew attention to within this discussion. This Grand Unifying Theory of the system itself, with auto-denialism being the most egregious example in my opinion, is an instruction manual for rendering the human animal completely docile, perfectly isolated in its own Ego, and entirely defenseless against the very real, physical bulldozers of the bio-digital machine and its Data Centre build-out. Thank you again for taking the time to comment! Have a great day.

Show less