PFIZER'S SELF ASSEMBLING BOTS TRIGGERED BY EMF Dr. Jane Ruby

Dr. Jane Ruby continues to review the recent virology paper on self-assembling nanotech in the vaccines. In this review, she goes over the effects of UV light, 5G, EMF and temperature on the nanotech. 



Comments

  1. At the start she says, "We know 'know' that the jab (was a self-assembling ) bioweapon." Which goes 100% against the best piece you posted on this August 4th. To further mute ones connection true source.

    This is fiction to further drag beings into the "figure out why" Notnilc bog. No need to go into that bog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My model is that demonic energies are embedded and move in technology. The push to transhumanism and AI is not by chance. I believe these injections are meant to corrupt the spirit AND the body. Per the August 4 post, different individuals are susceptible to different degrees to the injections effects depending on their identification with their spiritual essence. I don't believe it is fiction. The whole purpose of the CV-AI operation was to get as many people as possible injected. THEY were frantic to inject manKIND

      https://dirtybennywrites.blogspot.com/2024/01/their-hive-was-desperate-to-get-mankind.html

      I do not think this was without purpose or without nefarious intent. It would make sense that THEIR transhuman agenda could be pushed far forward by injecting manKIND with nanotech. I have spent the last several years getting all WIFI out of my house. You cannot even buy a stereo amplifier without bluetooth or WIFI in it. THEY are flooding the realm with abnormal frequencies. Check out Lookoutfa Charlie's research. The model put forth by these 2 researchers makes sense to me. I prefer to observe my enemy and know their next route of attack.

      For the record, I do not embrace the model of "source". I don't even know what it means. I know that I am not going to merge with anything or anybody. My individuality is my essence. I do not have any intention of giving that up for any reason.

      Thanks for your comment, best, db

      Delete
    2. I only meant that the lady speaking in this was fiction, not the August 4th post. It also sounds that you have discovered the "one source" is fiction, but I was not referring to that, I was referring to our friend Matt's reference to "inner tuning fork." There is a "You," and there is a "you." The "You" cannot be seen, and thing observed in the mirror is "you."

      Delete
    3. Agreed...thanks for the comment..best, db

      Delete
  2. She comes across as a Dr of mixology at the local bar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The purpose of posting this is not to endorse the presenter, but rather to have a video/audio review of the scientific paper out of Japan/Korea. My guess is most will not read it.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who writes the music? The BOX.

Miami Bayside Marketplace Alien Sighting?

Beyonce and Sasha Fierce...a case study in demonic possession